Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Neidermeyer
The landline limitation is gone for good, they are busy throwing the dirt on it, and engaging in a D-Day like push to have this expanded to include cable and Internet access for those who "can't afford it".

It is redistribution of wealth, plain and simple.

There are many of us who don't see a big of a problem in giving people who need help access to basic foodstuffs such as flour, milk, etc. but we feel our blood pressure go up when we go into a store (as I did near me, where I took this picture):

I see this telecommunication BS in exactly the same light. I wouldn't have as much of a problem with helping elderly people on a fixed income who can't pay for their meds, heat, and telephone to meet their landline expenses for a variety of purposes.

Where I do have a problem is where this expands into cell phones with texting and data plans, cable access, and Internet access, because it is "just, right, and fair" (from the FCC's own statement about the Lifeline Program, which made me want to puke)

35 posted on 12/26/2016 8:33:16 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Lobster 100 years ago was so plentiful it was a food of the poor... Boston and the state of Massachusetts have a law on the books limiting the number of times each week orphans , schoolchildren and prisoners can be fed lobster.

http://gizmodo.com/lobsters-were-once-only-fed-to-poor-people-and-prisoner-1612356919


39 posted on 12/26/2016 9:13:58 AM PST by Neidermeyer (Bill Clinton is a 5 star general in the WAR ON WOMEN and Hillary is his Goebbels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson