bill moyers-- impeach trump

https://twitter.com/BillMoyersHQ ^ | 12/10/2016 | bill moyers

[Paleo Pete]

I’ve been questioning this myself.

How did anyone “hack” voting machines that are not connected to the Internet? You have to have physical contact, and I doubt if it could be done in the couple of minutes it takes one to vote.

The bigger question I ask myself is why?

Why would Russia tamper with our election in order to help Trump? That’s ludicrous.

Let’s look at the major players...

Hillary Clinton - The most incredibly dishonest, corrupt politician this side of Pluto. If - and FBI Director Comey says they probably did - if Russia hacked Hillary’s email server, she is also exceptionally susceptible to blackmail.

Donald Trump - Alpha male business leader, too rich to be bought (if this were possible it would have been done long ago and he would have dropped out of the race in a couple of weeks at most), not a politician, has the backbone to stand up to the establishment politicians, and listens to the people.

Putin - Ex KGB operative, super rich dictator, bully, and also an alpha male leader. (sorry folks, whether you like him or not, he’s still a leader. As in not a follower.)

So why would Putin want another alpha male, Donald Trump, in the White House, a President he certainly would not push around? Bullies thrive on pushing people around, preferably those smaller and weaker than they themselves are.

Wouldn’t he greatly prefer Hillary, who he almost certainly can blackmail and control, and definitely can manipulate with ease? Wouldn’t he prefer the candidate who has already shown her predilection for corruption and greed, who can be paid off if nothing else?

Russia tampering with our election to help Trump makes no sense whatsoever. Putin would not want a President who would push back, he’s a bully. He would want the already proven to be weak SoS who he may despise, but he knows he can manipulate her.

What are the Democrats claiming? I’m not sure they know...but as far as I can tell, they want us to believe Trump was elected due to interference in our election by Russia. They are leaving it vague so they can rearrange their narrative every time someone debunks the existing one.

As far as I know, nobody has offered any concrete verification that any interference actually took place, just the usual “anonymous sources inside XYZ department” they always quote. Hillary wants a scapegoat, to avoid admitting she lost because she was not what the people wanted. It’s been her standard operating procedure for years. Remember her “vast right wing conspiracy” claims when Bill was being impeached...same thing. Always blame someone else (remind you of anyone?).

It’s another attempt to muddy the waters, and distract us from the elephant in the room by getting us to look at the shiny object.

And I’m pretty sure that just like everything else they have tried, it will not only fail, but backfire.

[mumblypeg]

“They are leaving it vague so they can rearrange their narrative everytime someone debunks the existing one.”

That’s it, right there. The Dems know their rank and file sycophants have PC memory, which is essentially the attention span of gnats. Whatever is “true” right now has always been true; all prior and contradictory information is down the memory hole and never existed.