You have to be careful of their true intentions with these, too.
One of their tactics is to “repeal to a new position”.
You start with a current law, A. You WANT TO go to C but you know the people would never vote for it...
So you pass law B. B is the OPPOSITE of C.
Then they file suit against B that goes to a judge for interpretation.
Liberal judge says B is ‘unconstitutional’, so the OPPOSITE of B must be true, or C.
Notice they didn't ‘repeal’ the law and go BACK TO A. They ‘repealed to a new position’ C, which is what they wanted all along.
They went from A to C via the court, not the legislature.
They did this with Gays in the Military. They instituted “Don't Ask Don't Tell” (which some might argue was the policy all along) and then took DADT to court and ‘repealed’ it- to go to a whole new position: Open Gays in the military.
They did the same thing with Gay Marriage. They passed a poorly written law banning it, then repealed that - so the opposite became law: Gay Marriage must now be allowed in every State.
WATCH FOR THEM TO TRY THIS WITH SHARIA LAW!
They pass a law saying it is illegal, declare that law ‘unconstitutional and ‘repeal’ it to say Sharia must be legal.
Wrong. Foreign and sharia north are referenced occasionally. There is nothing wrong with making it codified.