You’re overreacting. This is not a political position. If she can help on the cyber security end of things that’s not bad at all. Also, she understands that China is the true threat and she’s not a Russian hawk. Intelligence gathering is not supposed to be political. If she can do the job then why not?
I watched the debates
She is an irrationally angry woman who thinks no Fly zones over SYRIA is a good thing
She was totally confrontational on how to deal with Russia
This is what is going to coordinate national intelligence estimates?
I don’t THINK so
Plus she ran HP into the ground so don’t talk about her being a tech guru or an effective executive
Something is terribly wrong if a lightweight with attitude gets this position
Ps: if she did the hoky poky with ted cruz or her campaign director did and then accepted a $500k cruz PAC bribe to shut it up, she is blackmailable
Btw - it is a TERRIBLY political position as knows anyone who has ever suffered through coordinating an intelligence issue position , NIE, or a product for the WH or the national intelligence community
Every adjective noun verb and punctuation mark is a potential political position - not to mention the conclusion