Trumps conflict of interest

Democrats bemoan the potential of conflicts of interest for Donald Trump. Indeed could he as president not only steer law making and application in a way that would benefit his diverse business directly, he could also be influenced by entities who agree to very favorable terms in business dealings. Bloomberg for example recently reported that a bank under the control of the Chinese government was due to renegotiate its lease at Trump Tower in Manhattan.

Donald Trump announced that he would not involve himself in his business anymore to avoid such conflicts, but that does not satisfy critics, who point out, that even if all assets were transferred to his children, his actions as president can still benefit his family.

But Donald Trump is not the only one, for whom there is a potential conflict of interest. The most blatant recent example is Hillary Clinton. In 2015 she gave 6 speeches for almost $ 1.5 million, while Bill Clinton gave 28 speeches for almost $ 7 million. That is more than twice the amount per speech that George W. Bush earns and one must wonder, whether the speeches are actually worth these fees or whether the money is being paid for something else. There is also the issue of donations to the Clinton foundation, where members of the Clinton family are being well compensated for their philanthropic work. Any politician, who has family, friends or shows some kind of economic activity will inevitably be faced with a conflict of interest, it is unavoidable.

Donald Trump according to Forbes already has a net worth of $ 3.7 billion and while he is obviously very conscious of his health, does not smoke or drink, at 70 years of age it is unlikely, that he will be forced to forgo any luxury for the remainder of his life after his term as president is up due to a lack of funds. Additional wealth he may acquire by cutting deals to the detriment of the nation and designed for personal enrichment will not contribute much additional utility at this point.

At the same time, he is being given the opportunity to go down in history as one of the most remarkable presidents of the United States. Starting out as the most unlikely candidate he won the nomination and the presidency against all odds: Outspent 2:1, endorsed not by a single national newspaper, overwhelmingly negative media reports, opposed by many in his own party and with a seemingly hopeless lag in the polls his election was a much bigger surprise than Ronald Reagans was in 1980. From everything we know, Donald Trump is very confident of his own abilities and it is reasonable to assume that he firmly believes, that he can make America great again, that he will succeed at this task if he puts his mind to it.

Great presidents are fondly remembered by the American people, the obvious adoration on display during the funeral of Ronald Reagan in 2004 bears testament to that. By rescuing the patient (Trump once said, America needed major surgery), which Donald Trump thinks he is capable of, he can have his name remembered for generations to come and with his inclination to imprint his name on almost everything he owns or does, that appears to be a primary objective of his.

I conclude, that Donald Trump may be more interested in having people hundreds of years from now speak of him with great reverence and appreciate his contribution to America rather than using the office of the president to simply heap up more money, that he could never spend in his life anyway.

I’m in an ongoing debate with a liberal family member who believes Trump is just more of the same old same old. She recently asked me a question to which I offered what I believe to be a reasonable answer.

QUESTION: “It’s a Goldman Reunion in Trump’s White House. Is that what you voted for?”
ANSWER:
WE voted for COMPETENCE in government, a commodity SORELY and CONSPICUOUSLY absent from the obozo/jarrett junta! I LIKE Bannon and nearly all his ideas. We’ll have to wait to see about the others. But more f**king Marxist community organizers would have taken us over the edge into a bottomless pit from which it would require a civil war to return.

Where do we get people who understand the currently f**ked up, Marxist central bank , fiat currency financial system? Sadly, from the ranks of those who have mucked about in it in the PRIVATE SECTOR.

That said, should any of those folks, once installed and operating, be found to be committing fraud, enriching themselves, their cronies and friends – as was the MO for the Democrat candidate – trust me when I tell you that IF the same folks who put Trump in office and are now screaming for Hillary’s scalp find themselves being F**KED OVER AGAIN, they will turn on Trump and HIS crew before you can say “pitchforks, tar and feathers”.

And, unlike obozo’s mendacious and malevolent minions, Jeff Sessions would NOT allow himself to be “Lynched” (in BOTH meanings of that word) for turning a blind eye to that corruption.

What does concern me, however, is that the departing crew of criminals, understanding that obozo’s and his criminal associates’ skin color immunized them from closer scrutiny or removal for CLEAR ACTS OF TREASON, were so brazen and in our faces that it may take us some time to see it among the new guys!

But should it come to that, WE WILL ULTIMATELY SEE IT AND ACT IF NECESSARY!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.