The article “The Fall of Islam” is very good and applies well to today in explaining how islam works.
We should bring back the term “mussulman” as it describes islamics much better than the PC terms in use today.
The part about the women and the way they teach the children is also good.
“The Fall of Islam” was an interesting read. The lack of a Koranic doctrine of “render unto Ceasar” appears to be a permanent part of the religion. The inferiority of the secular leadership to the clerical is a prominent feature of Islamic society.
It was particularly interesting the analogy the author made between Islamic theocracy and the American doctrine of judicial review, where a court can declare a law unconstitutional. That is an analogy I have not made and one with which I am not entirely comfortable. But it is valid if one considers that in every Islamic state, the Koran, as interpreted by the Mad Mullahs, is in fact their organic constitutional law.