“Whatever attack there might have been on Project Veritas, it is absurd to suggest that Breitbart just happened to connect Podesta and 14 year-old sex slaves.”
How is that absurd when the tweets:
* Specifically reference Planned Parenthood, the target of Veritas’ investigation
* Specifically reference the Media Matters conference call that was held to defend PP about this video
* Specifically reference the people who were on that conference call
* Specifically reference the talking points that were discussed on that conference call
* Are from within days of the video release
* Correspond to articles on Breitbart’s website about the Veritas investigation
* The Veritas investigation was about trying to procure abortions for a supposed 14 year-old sex slave (who didn’t actually exist)
It doesn't matter if the sex slave didn't actually exist, what clearly matters is that Planned Parenthood THOUGHT it did, and was willing to try to help keep that sex slave operation going by performing the hypothetical abortions while knowing they were sex slaves.
To say that's not related to the investigations that are going on is absurd.