[TigerLikesRooster]

When a science is generating never-ending stream of extremely complicated theories to explain certain observed phenomena, it could be an indication that the whole approach is flawed. It may be more than their theory being probabilistic.

It happened once in Astronomy. Astronomers had the notion that planets have circular orbits. If that failed to explain their observed motion, they revised their theory to address the issue: a planet is moving along a circular orbit which is also moving along a larger circular orbit. In time they have to create endless number of various nested circular orbits to make their theory fit observed data.

Took a while to realize that the obsession with circle is holding them back.

[UCANSEE2]

Even though the answer had been provided to us by GOD and was under our nose from the beginning of life on the Earth.