Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve
21twelve :" (I mean - how can she benefit from a recount?)

If it is a bot run by someone who is wealthy (ie : Soros), the recount could be claimed to be publicly funded, source of bot remains unknown.
For what purpose : possible delay of formal certification of the recent election ?; bolster the DNC claim of irregularities ?
If she should change her mind and not pursue a recount: all that money is hers
How do you think Bernie funded and got his cabin on the island in Vermont ?

18 posted on 11/24/2016 2:39:31 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Tilted Irish Kilt

In the Wikileaks emails they were giving instructions to take large donations and break them into thousands of small $20 donations using fake doner names. They were taking say a 1 million dollar donation which is illegal and making it look like a bunch of regular folks donated it. Anything under $50 doesn’t need to be verified according to election rules, they even stated the $50 threshold in the email I saw.

So they are probably doing the same thing here, a bot is registering a bunch of small donations using a bogus list of addresses.


87 posted on 12/05/2016 4:41:02 AM PST by bigtoona (Make America Great Again! America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson