Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter Sent Twitter Into A Flurry By Explaining How Hillary Could Still Be Prosecuted
dailycaller.com ^
| Nov. 22, 2016
| Christian Datoc
Posted on 11/22/2016 6:34:55 PM PST by PROCON
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
LOL! Keep their heads exploding, Ann.
I don't know how to post tweets so they're at the linky.
1
posted on
11/22/2016 6:34:55 PM PST
by
PROCON
To: PROCON
Empanel a grand jury and take the politics out of it.
To: PROCON
She and Milo could tag-team off and on for WH Press Secretary..!
3
posted on
11/22/2016 6:37:19 PM PST
by
gaijin
To: PROCON
LOL, I have been following it...some splody heads for sure...oh the thought of having the ‘queen’ of filth, lies, stealing, corruption to be brought to Justice is just more than they can bare...poor babies...
4
posted on
11/22/2016 6:39:59 PM PST
by
HarleyLady27
('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
To: gaijin
LOL! I would pay to see that.
5
posted on
11/22/2016 6:45:05 PM PST
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(****happy dance**** BIGLY!!!!)
To: PROCON
She is not saying anything new. I’ve been saying that since the story first came out. And I wasn’t the first one to say it.
6
posted on
11/22/2016 6:46:01 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
To: PROCON
It is good that Trump is prioritizing Obamacare repeal and tax reform issues above all else. The rest of his agenda will follow. As to the Clintons..., the chips will fall where they may in due time. As President (not Candidate), Trump should not render opinions which WOULD later be used to void any possible criminal convictions!
7
posted on
11/22/2016 6:50:23 PM PST
by
ExSES
(the "bottom-line")
To: PROCON
Doesn’t the Attorney General function independently of the President? If the Attorney General considers it necessary to prosecute Hillary, would the President—properly—not interfere?
8
posted on
11/22/2016 6:51:35 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Trump is the Resistance! Vive la résistance!)
To: Savage Beast
Your question is above my pay grade.
We shall see.
9
posted on
11/22/2016 6:59:14 PM PST
by
PROCON
(Onto the Great American Rebirth!)
To: PROCON
Ann is only stating the obvious, the simple ploy utilized by the Obama Administration, e.g., that Lynch would follow the FBI recommendations... thus President Trump can allow the NSA or FBI or DOJ or State or the person in charge of “America’s 17 Intel agencies” to prosecute Hillary. It does not require the President to weight on every matter of “law enforcement” as did Obama. It is far better to allow Lady Liberty whose blind eye of justice tip the scales herself against American’s first Ms. Evil.
10
posted on
11/22/2016 7:14:05 PM PST
by
Jumper
To: PROCON
I’ve been thinking this since I first heard it earlier today. It seemed like the wording was carefully chosen. I doubt he’d allow her to go unchallenged in her lawlessness. But this might give her incentive to challenge the election results now that computer experts have encouraged a challenge based on possibility of hacking.
11
posted on
11/22/2016 7:17:22 PM PST
by
ALASKA
(Landslide.........)
To: PROCON
I suspect he has been briefed on her health through the grapevine and knows that she will be but a bad memory this time next year.
12
posted on
11/22/2016 7:22:47 PM PST
by
Trod Upon
(Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
To: Savage Beast
And it IS necessary to prosecute her, if only to determine the extent & consequences of damage, and how to prevent recurrence. Even if she’s pardoned, the investigation must be fully pursued - which will at least destroy her reputation and likely induce suitable consequences.
13
posted on
11/22/2016 7:34:22 PM PST
by
ctdonath2
("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
To: Trod Upon
All that money should not go to Bill or the daughter.
14
posted on
11/22/2016 7:34:26 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(Make America Normal Again)
To: ctdonath2
And it IS necessary to prosecute her, if only to determine the extent & consequences of damage, and how to prevent recurrence. Correct. She isn't the only one who has committed crimes. There is Huma, Mills, the IT guys, members of the State Department, etc. They all need to be prosecuted.
15
posted on
11/22/2016 7:47:40 PM PST
by
TheCipher
(Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
To: ctdonath2
I agree. Perhaps it seems
sporting to pardon her, but it's not. People who have committed less offenses have been punished severely. Not only is the rule of law challenged, but the equal protection of all citizens under it is challenged--if her criminal conduct is not pursued.
To say that the Clintons have suffered enough is to ignore the suffering of other criminals.
Donald Trump promised America to clean up the corruption in Washington. Does he intend to fulfill his promises, or is he merely another corrupt politician? We shall see.
16
posted on
11/22/2016 7:54:11 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Trump is the Resistance! Vive la résistance!)
To: Savage Beast
Actually Hillary hasn’t suffered much at all. She has been making money. Many would say she leads a luxurious life. So she lost becoming POTUS.
17
posted on
11/22/2016 7:57:49 PM PST
by
Jane Austen
(Nimrata "Nikki" Haley hates America, welcomes radical Muslims)
To: Trod Upon
That’s my guess. I was shocked that she was able to campaign as she did the final week. She has some serious issues that could accelerate at any time. She had no business running for potus.
Now she keeps popping up sans make-up. She is counting on getting a pass due to her failing health and Mr. Bill’s.
To: ctdonath2
What Trump must do is leave the question of prosecuting the Clintons--and anyone else--up to the Attorney General. Politics MUST be kept out of this! The Attorney General should decide ONLY on the merits of the case.
19
posted on
11/22/2016 7:58:38 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Trump is the Resistance! Vive la résistance!)
To: Jane Austen
I agree, but there are reports that Trump has said something to that effect.
20
posted on
11/22/2016 7:59:27 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Trump is the Resistance! Vive la résistance!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson