To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
Hopefully we have an FR Quantum Computer Whiz who will give us a status on the State of the Art in Quantum Computing. The last time I checked in we were still building cryogenic Quantum Computers.
That has to go. We need inexpensive room temperature Q-bits to make these machines practical. If that happens is will be "Katy bar door the door".
![](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_247I_X6LNEs/RmhI22rT5oI/AAAAAAAAAG0/74RfsrHj8iA/s400/10018854~When-Conspirators-Seek-to-Murder-James-I-of-Scotland-Posters.jpg)
4 posted on
11/22/2016 4:48:04 AM PST by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
To: LibWhacker
Microsoft wants to turn quantum computing research into real products Which is the only way to recover your research costs.
5 posted on
11/22/2016 4:57:13 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: LibWhacker
This article makes it sound like quantum computers are still in the future, but they’ve been around for a few years. D-Wave is the big name in that realm.
And, yes, the NSA has them.
6 posted on
11/22/2016 5:48:58 AM PST by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: LibWhacker
I figure Microsoft will need quantum computing to keep the bloat of their operating systems and applications from turning the next-gen CPUs into the computing equivalent of a 386 performance wise.
8 posted on
11/22/2016 7:37:46 AM PST by
zeugma
(I'm going to get fat from all this schadenfreude)
To: LibWhacker
Great. Quantum BSOD at a distance.
To: LibWhacker
Think of what this will do for cat pictures and porn!
To: LibWhacker
All your passwords are belong to Microsoft.
12 posted on
11/22/2016 7:25:46 PM PST by
TChad
(Propagandists should not be treated like journalists.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson