Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wastoute

“I am a doctor. If I can sit down with a person for a half hour with their numbers I can explain things but to try to unburden a crowd of their many misconceptions simultaneously just ain’t possible.”

Yeah, I sold statins for years, and am quite familiar with all the statin CV outcome trials. There is just no question that statins reduce the risk of CV events. Now, there is the question of relative risk reduction vs absolute risk reduction.

Often, the absolute risk reduction over ~5 years is 1 or 2%. It may not sound like much, but with CV disease, we are too often talking about death as the first symptom. With some history of fatal heart attacks on my mother’s side, I’ll take any risk reduction I can get. I’ve been taking Crestor for several years now, and I have no side effects at all. I did have some pains on pravastatin. For those who have had issues with muscle aches on Lipitor or other statins, I’d recommend a trial on Crestor. The nice thing about Crestor is that it is effective at such low doses.


46 posted on 11/15/2016 1:31:02 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: mtrott

One has to know what they are doing to actually reduce risk. Early studies were, I believe confounded by folks who should not have been treated.


52 posted on 11/15/2016 1:43:27 PM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson