Posted on 11/08/2016 9:14:43 AM PST by wfu_deacons
"More voters this year are looking for a strong leader than in previous presidential elections, according to an early morning exit poll, whose results could shift significantly over the course of Election Day."
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
We got this thing!
Correct, if you are "angry" about the way things are going why would you vote for someone who's entire campaign is Obama's 3rd term?
Except some people actually thinks that’s Hillary.
Drudge shows a woman slightly hunched forward and hanging on to the stair rail at the top. Pic does not show strength. Subtle.
A better hint would be a pic of Hillary being dragged in the van on 9-11.
Exactly!!
Yeah, thats a strong leader right there!
“She’s leaning on a rail. Looks weak. Subtle hint: Strong leader ain’t Hillary.”
About 10% see that, the rest see Strong Hillary. Drudge can be insanely STUPID.
What do voters mean when they say "strong"? Don't inhale standing downwind when she's been hitting the bottle and is propped against a bollard, or vigorous and healthy? I have a guess, but we'll see once SEIU finished manufacturing as many fake votes as they think they can sneak through.
Note: Lunch break - finally. Working get-out-the-vote in Pennsylvania. So far, polls look very busy, but I cannot tell how the vote is actually going.
I guess all those wanting a weak leader will vote in the afternoon, huh?
Strong leadership without a vision, is wasted. A vision not based on shared values is scary. A strong leader without shared values would likely lead us to places we don't want to go. Better a weak leader with no vision but one who at least shares our values.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.