Theres a message when two grand juries arent impressed.
Isn't that odd when a special prosecutor could persuade a grand jury to "indict a ham sandwich."
I”What a load of BS you spin! You were all out to ‘disprove me’ yet when I fight back you turn tail and run, just like you have done before. “
I somehow suspect that you have more than a little expertise in BS. Intentional or not. Since I don’t consider analyzing the merits of a case to be a fight I wasn’t aware that I was engaged in one. I lost interest in this thread a couple of days ago once it became apparent that this was one of the evidence-free Satanism/Child Sexual Abuse stories from the late ‘80s.
The lack of evidence is why the grand juries wouldn’t touch it. And it’s why two of the plaintiffs were convicted of perjury. If you were to be charged with a crime I suspect that even you would become a staunch defender of the necessity of evidence.
Apparently Alex Jones and InfoWars is why the Franklin case has been resurrected from the dead. Jones is trying to use Franklin as “proof” of his belief that elites who rule the world are part of a widespread Satanic conspiracy.
Jones thinks that a default judgement of a million bucks awarded to Paul Bonacci against King proved Bonacci’s allegations. It didn’t, there was no defense offered by King, it was a default judgment, and this was a civil trial, not a criminal one. King did not appear in court to offer a defense, not surprising since at the time he was a guest of the federal prison system serving a 15 year sentence for embezzlement and fraud and he was already bankrupt.