Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PJammers

He found no reason to indict.

Indict whom? Clinton?? The presidents pardon powers are absolute. Was there a bribe here, probably yes, could he suffer for it, no.

Marc Rich’s pardon was for criminal acts. He never set foot in the US again as back taxes and penalties would be gathered. (as far as we know as there were rumors he worked for the CIA in some capacity).

BTW, whom were most responsible for walking this through the DOJ? None other than Mr. Holder and his cohort Mr. Kadzik. Kadzik sound familiar, he is the turd running interference currently in the DOJ regarding the current FBI probes into the Clintons.

Trump is so right, the swamp needs draining, the game is so fixed to be unrelenting against the honest in DC. When it gets drained, I hope they begin erecting the light poles to hang all the SOBs from.


13 posted on 11/02/2016 6:19:14 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Mouton

Like Obamacare failing right before the election, the reappearance of the Rich pardon couldn’t come at a better time. Any end of term pardons that Obama tries will receive extra scrutiny from the media and the public.


15 posted on 11/02/2016 7:14:52 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Mouton

They wanted to prosecute Clinton for selling pardons.


16 posted on 11/02/2016 7:49:15 AM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson