Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

You fall for the trap. She must be nuts to do this. That is paternalistic rationalization.

Its sad we dont view everyone equal under the law. No we still make excuses for the gals.

When was the last time you thought a guy was nuts who raped a disabled person? You dont. Guys are evil, women cant be evil ,they must be nuts.

Its never been like that. Women have always abused weaker people. Average healthy men usually havent taken that crap so they generally dont want to lose so they are not normal targets, unless they are armed and maybe in a group. But the elderly, disabled and kids are the prime targets of women abusers because they are usually in,positions of power over them and are stronger and can do it.

Women abuse who they can successfully abuse, men abuse who they successfully abuse. In both cases it hinges on whether that person has an abusive mentality or not. Not all men and women abuse, but when thry do, they always pick weaker targets than themselves. Womens options usually just dont include healthy men.


20 posted on 10/26/2016 1:16:57 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man
Punishments should be the same for women as for men in these situations, no question. A distinction I'd make — and it is one that has no moral significance — is that sometimes peoples’ motivations may be “nuts”, but that doesn't make their actions any less evil. A man who was attracted to a mildly simple-minded but physically beautiful sixteen year old girl would be not be “nuts” in his motivation, but would be morally depraved and criminal if he acted on it. In this situation, that a woman of high intelligence would be romantically/sexually attracted to a mentally and severely physically impaired man is indeed “sick”, but that “sickness” does not mitigate the simple depravity and illegality of her actions in manipulating him and acting on her attraction. So, I do agree with those who assert that this woman is “nuts”, but I think she also is “evil”. Being crazy (in the non-legally insane sense) and being bad are not mutually exclusive.
28 posted on 10/26/2016 1:50:39 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

Well said. The only reason Hillary has a chance is the false moral pedestal upon which feminism has installed women as an entire sex. It’s got to go - it’s destroying the world.


37 posted on 10/26/2016 2:13:18 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson