Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker

Understood.

In the last 4 elections it has tended a bit towards Repub in comparison to the national vote but not enough to justify the current “lead” Clinton has in most of the national polls.

There is also the perhaps “significant” effect the 2 minor parties may have in OH and nationwide that may bring a different result this election.


10 posted on 10/22/2016 2:11:03 PM PDT by Az Joe (Desu Hoc Vult!! The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Az Joe

The Clinton lead is mostly due to her doing much better than Obama in the South. She’s doing about the same in the rust belt, and worse in the Northeast. Our losses in the South and gains in the Northeast are mostly irrelevant - except we can lose North Carolina (and - huge maybe - Georgia) and could win New Hampshire and a delegate in Maine. But in the end does it really matter if we win Texas by twenty points or only ten points? Not really, but it has a big impact on national polls.


11 posted on 10/22/2016 2:27:33 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson