"I’ll work with writers worldwide on longform stories for the magazine and breaking news for the web, on issues that mean a lot to me: cultural diversity, the environment, climate change and species preservation, among others." - "The current Editor-in-Chief of the National Geographic Magazine, Susan Goldberg."
“Voices from a changing continent” implies that what is happening is some sort of natural process occurring without action by anyone in particular.
“Voices from a continent being changed” would be a lot more accurate.
Now there’s a lady who has an overt hatred for white people, and America. Thanks for outing her.
Bruce, you’ve just made another gold record!
Colonization of Africa and Asia = Bad
Of Europe? Awesome!!!
“With the worst history of xenophobia, Germany has taken in the most refugees of any European country. The stakes of the experiment are high.”
It does not take a genius or an historian to know the outcome — disappearance of traditional Germany and Germans. The Germans do know that, don’t they? Every country throughout history that has been overrun, disappears. It is just not that many that purposefully engineered their own demise.
Susan Goldberg illustrates well the nature of “Stockholm Syndrome” as she offers up mealy-mouthed excuses for her angry, highly active, would-be oppressors.
Editor sounds like another hard-core leftist. I remember when the National Geographic was a magazine I could admire.
But that's not the case...
Islam is not diversity of thought, expression, art, or human striving... it's the opposite. It's the suppression of what's unique and noble in the human spirit.
If the pictures were to reflect the truth they would show a different story - a story of extreme conformity with draconian punishments of those who deviate from the orthodoxy. The pictures are a lie.
A hotel owner in Germany says “The money they’re given, they spend here in town” and it’s considered an ‘economic plus.’ Perhaps the hotel owner could give money directly to the people staying in his hotel. Wouldn’t that be an ‘economic plus’ as well? Perhaps the government could give that money back to it’s own taxpayers. Wouldn’t that be a plus also?
Rediculously, even in a Forbes article I’ve seen this notion that giving people money (in exchange for nothing and creating no multiplier) to spend in your country is an economic plus, without regard to where the funds come from.
It’s a garbage article that barely gives any voice to the problems caused by mass Muslim immigration.
“The New Invaders....” Fixed it.