Posted on 10/18/2016 1:51:33 PM PDT by Signalman
In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.
then look at the way the Just Us Department handled the New Black Panthers patrolling poling places in uniform with billy clubs in Philadelphia (no legal action taken),
then look at the MANY voting precincts in Illinois and other states that had more ballots cast than registered voters (no legal action), or in some cases more ballots cast than the population, or MANY precincts where Republicans get ZERO votes (not even investigated).
Then can someone inform the President that there may be a little more than a "smidge" of voting corruption?
There’s a 100% for Obama votes in a precinct chant he already knows.
He just lies. It’s one of three commonalities with the DNC, the other two bring support for gays or the murder of innocents.
“Chance”, not chant ... I hate typos....
The press will not be able to ignore this. They have to report it or lose what little relevance they have.
Send it around to all your e-mail addressees. It will eventually get to even the most dedicated Hillary sycophants and vagina voters. The MSM won’t do it. You can bet the ranch on that.
Have the usual suspects thrown out their old defense of, “Everybody does it, so it’s all a wash/no big deal” yet?
obamma is what he is
Good video but I think the first one was more damning since it was more about specific events that they orchestrated. I hope he has one with Hillary directly involved in misdeeds on camera, but that’s probably unlikely.
Foval resigned. Why hasn’t Creamer? Why hasn’t his wife?
Sure they will, because their “relevance” is now how they help elect Democrats.
I don’t know if you are old enough to recall, but back in ‘92 only a few journalists decided to carry Bill Clinton’s water for him and they basically managed to get him elected.
But their decision to do so didn’t happen in a vacuum, they didn’t wake up one day and decide to be corrupt.
No, before Bill Clinton there was another that they didn’t protect.
He was Gary Hart: a charismatic southerner with strong appeal running for the Democratic nomination.
But one day the press published a picture of him and his floozy on his boat.
I believe it was Senator Hollings who said upon seeing the picture, in that Foghorn Leghorn accent of his: “it appears that the Senator has changed his mind on offshore drillin’.”
In the wake of Hart’s fall from favor and the subsequent loss of the White House to Poppa Bush it seems that a myth had grown that if only they hadn’t cared about sex, as they’d so often not cared about sex before, then the charismatic Senator would have won and spared us a Republican administration.
Please note, though, that the reason for not caring about sex had changed. Before it was because they ... didn’t care. Afterwards it was because they wanted Democrats to win.
So with the success of a few journalists to protect Clinton the rest took notice: they could influence election outcomes ... not with truth but with a certain point of view, to borrow a line from from Obi Wan.
And of course once they’d circled the wagons they found out that they had to circle them for every little thing. So certain point of view steadily became a party line ... and willful complicity with lies.
These suck in others within their sphere of influence. It isn’t a vast conspiracy of collusion but of common cause and going along to get along where the narrative is really easy to predict needing no central clearing house ... though talking points did come along to help keep things on message.
It’s like what that guy says in the new Veritas video: they talk about all sorts of stuff they don’t talk about.
And their significance is not in reporting the news but in advancing a cause.
Time was it was socialists and communists who were deemed subversive ... now telling the truth about Democrats is subversive.
It’s how Assange, once the darling of the left while revealing Bush Administration secrets, has now become a tool of whatever devil so-called “progressives” may still be able the believe in.
Is Foval a little light in the loafers?
Want to bet? I think you’re dreaming. The press ignores all this kind of stuff.
It is like treason and anarchy all rolled into one and they will ignore it and most of us will go, “Meh” because what can we do? Who are we going to tell? Are going to finally take up arms? Are we going to postpone the election? Are we going to force purple fingers and written ballots? If so who is going to be trustworthy to count and compile the count?
. . . and I will bet you he is on a one-way flight to Switzerland.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
