Posted on 10/06/2016 9:44:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
What if Trump and Clinton Have the Same Core Beliefs?
Gee, and what if Global Warming Was a Farce.
Mrs. Clinton believes in a Government that re-engineers the social & cultural values, to purposes that go far beyond the lives of her fellow countrymen. She believes in a utilitarian collectivist vision--similar to that of the Communists & Nazis, where the individual, his labor, savings, aspirations & heritage are unimportant, and may be appropriated--where Government forces a dogma based upon the cloudborne theories of its proponents on a subservient population.
He's there as a pressure valve to keep the unruly masses from taking their country back. He's working for the demoncrats. He's a PIECE OF SH!T
Trump has previously expressed displeasure at how President Obama has exploited hurricanes for political advantage. In 2012, Trump predicted that the destruction of Superstorm Sandy would help Obama win reelection over Mitt Romney.
take a midol
What if Andrew Napolitano and Janet Napolitano had the same core values?
I used to think they were diametrically opposite, but every once in a while Andrew comes up with some ideas that make me wonder if they aren’t really that far apart.
On one hand you have an evil, wealthy individual supported by Wall street, who is hot tempered and mean and who maxed out tax deductions. On the other hand you have Trump. I choose the one hated by neo-cons, The MSM, and liberals.
that makes good sense
and at any event, Trump looks HOOOJLY better than HilLIARy!
VOTE TRUMP!
even IF that were true,... Trump hasn’t ruined the entire middle east, hasn’t had anyone killed, hasn’t lost $6billion of taxpayer money, hasn’t swindled people out of their money in whitewater deals, hasn’t obtained 900 FBI files illegally, hasn’t deleted emails under subpoena, hasn’t intimidated bill clinton’s rape victims into silence, etc etc etc...
WHAT IF Judge Andrew Napolitano WAS PLEASED AS PUNCH WITH THE GARY ALEPPO/WILLIAM WELD LIBERTARIAN TICKET, so that he wouldn’t have to concern himself with Trump and Clinton?
Sure she does- she believes in hilLIARy obtaining power, at any price
And pretty much nothing else
“Our next president will either be an offensive, rich, divisive bigot with a bad haircut, or Donald Trump.” - Scott Adams
The fact would remain that one is a criminal and one is not. That by itself should make all the difference. One made his billions in real estate and one made her billions selling her and her husband’s office. Not to mention embezzlement; remember the missing State Department billions and the Haiti reconstruction billions?
True. Trump may be the most left politician I voted for, but I firmly believe he will stop the bleeding of a lot of issues which is needed before recovery can begin.
You Bushies are something else. He sucked, and thank god we are getting someone who will put America first. Bush, Clinton, and Obama only differ in cultural veneer. The policies are identical NWO globalism and nationbuilding.
Trump is much better.
Might there be a great danger to liberty in making such erroneous assumption?
What if it turns out that we make an assumption that one candidate, not already part of the "insiders" who created the mess, and looking our disastrous national dilemma regarding economic security, personal and national security, and declining reputation at home and abroad, concludes that drastic change in personnel, policies, and attitudes prominent in both political parties is essential to "making America 'great' again," although what we know/can't know about that is impossible?
What if the other candidate whose decades of "insider" "experience," is determined to pursue the same-old-same-old "progressive" goal of "changing" America from its Constitutional limits and making that written structuring of government a mere "living Consitution" which said 'Progressives' can remold to suit themselves?
What if we miss the fact that, like Saul of the NT, one candidate may have had a non-religious "Damascus Road" experience when participating in the "progressive-controlled" "system" of government, formerly known as the Constitutionally-limited government, freedom of individual enterprise economic system, and now "sees" that the Framers' system has been perverted and needs to be restored to its former glory and strength?
What if??????
I believe that Bush, Clintons and Obamas are all in the same boat and have an intent to harm the USA, the Constitution and the American people anyway they can. Obama and Clinton, who have the power, have spent the past eight years onboard the deconstruct American ship. Let me count the ways!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.