But an even worse idea is letting your banks stay so big that they'll have to be bailed out again.
Where does this idea come from that bigger is more dangerous and smaller is safer?
16 posted on 10/06/2016 10:57:01 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot
("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
Use whatever adjective you like, doesn’t have to be big or small. But if a bank failure could collapse the economy unless we bail it out, then the bank has got to go.