Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Cheating at 1st Presidential Debate
Youtube ^ | Published on September 29, 2016 | taj9000 account on Youtube

Posted on 10/03/2016 4:24:29 PM PDT by Fred Nerks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161 next last
To: AndyTheBear
... And we should focus on why to vote for Trump: as in he can actually get crap done on time and under budget etc.

Understand the sentiment, but it's not enough, while even in Australia the MSM reports that Trump was trounced at the debate by a brilliant Hillary...I would prefer to see them all forced to admit THE VIDEO OF THE DEBATE clearly shows she had an inbuilt device in the podium which allowed her to READ HER RESPONSES.

You nip the lies in the bud as they happen, don't give her a pass by saying let's ignore that one and concentrate on something else...

61 posted on 10/03/2016 5:49:22 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
There clearly is something going on. If it was just routine picking up of note paper they would have also gone to Trump's podium. That combined with the strange Hand Signals to me is very suspicious. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck..... or in this case waddles like a hildebeast and cackles like a hildebeast......
62 posted on 10/03/2016 5:50:57 PM PDT by Newton (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Newton

I’m an Aussie, I have to be careful what I write, sometimes my opinions come out sounding like insults. Here’s one that isn’t going to make some people happy...

If I was Trump and had left the approval and final vetting of the debate set up to the RNC, and this is the best they could do, then I would know where my enemies were.

And everything changes from then on. I wouldn’t say a word, but nothing like this will ever be allowed to happen again.


63 posted on 10/03/2016 6:00:26 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

This was a good video. It does have 4 times where only Hillary’s podium is dealt with in some unknown way, taking things off, putting things inside it, etc. Was Trump’s podium ever dealt with?

Hillary was DEFINITELY reading some of those answers. Even Saturday Night Live got in on the act. Their debate had McKinnon as a very good Clinton (she owns an Emmy for this portrayal), telling the moderator that she came up with a great way to describe Trump’s economic plan, she just came up with it spontaneously, just now, off the cuff... and she looks straight down at her podium and carefully reads “Trumped Up Trickle Down.” It’s pretty funny because it is true. She was reading.

Trump can’t say ANYTHING about this blatant cheating. It would be turned on him. But just before the next debate, there should be some checking at the last minute of ears, podiums, whatever depending on the format. At the last minute, the debate commission should be dragged kicking and screaming to verify the rules are being followed. Let her think she got away with it. Then nail her by not allowing even a notepad. Check her ears. Jam all signals. Give them transparent podiums or have them sit at a table.


64 posted on 10/03/2016 6:01:06 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

This one took about three seconds to find:

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/09/29/hillary-clinton-conspiracy-theories-swirl-after-first-presidential-debate

We really should focus on beating Hillary. Trying to catch her cheating is not going to do anything but frustrate you.


65 posted on 10/03/2016 6:02:36 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

GMTA. You got it. One second after my latest comment. You just said it better than I could.


66 posted on 10/03/2016 6:03:46 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Nonsense.


67 posted on 10/03/2016 6:05:08 PM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I think the notes “cleaner” guy took off the podium contained a copy of Holt’s list of questions. It looks like he hooked up with Holt between the podiums and handed him something. Collusion?


68 posted on 10/03/2016 6:06:21 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I’ll tell you when a Conspiracy is real or not.

When the Uniparty COLLUDES AND CONSPIRES to trounce Trump at the debate by using illegal tactics.

Now, if your entire reason for being here is to make fun of the rest of us, disprove what our lying eyes are telling us.

ADDRESS THE EVIDENCE ON THE VIDEO.


69 posted on 10/03/2016 6:09:25 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan; WildHighlander57

Someone might care to make a list of the anomalies. There are many.


70 posted on 10/03/2016 6:10:46 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Some people seem to be professional “debunkers” when nothing has been actually debunked.


71 posted on 10/03/2016 6:12:17 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
This has been debunked six ways to Sunday. Time to find another conspiracy theory.

All I've seen is fury and name-calling from Hillbots; I haven't seen a single debunking, much less "six ways to Sunday."

Provide links, or you're a plant.

72 posted on 10/03/2016 6:13:39 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt; All

Would like to know what search terms you used.
That’s the kind of stuff I wanted, thanks!
(His behavior to Holt is still weird IMO)

Using “Brady Williamson” brings up a Conservative Treehouse ‘Cleaner Part 3’ that may be reassuring to the most doubtful:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/29/the-cleaner-part-iii-more-perspectives/

Yes, and Wikileaks isn’t going to save us from her either. We have to do it with a winning campaign.


73 posted on 10/03/2016 6:15:25 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

‘The Cleaner’ is a man with almost white hair, the man in the suit who appears right at the end of the video and removed something from the inside of the podium is another, younger man. Watch the video right to the end.


74 posted on 10/03/2016 6:21:51 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

LOL!


75 posted on 10/03/2016 6:25:09 PM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Your link shows a clearer image of the man in the suit removing something from the podium than the one I posted.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/29/the-cleaner-part-iii-more-perspectives/

• Three or four individuals are removing items from the Clinton lectern after debate.
• There are at least 7 trips to the lectern (four by Brady Williamson) After debate.
• One of the trips (not Willamson ) removes a cup of water. The other six ?
• During each removal there is a person watching over.
• The last time Brady Williamson visits the lectern he is most likely putting something back, it appears to be a brown box, not necessarily taking something out.

~~~~

I see nothing being put back, but that’s a whole lot of activity while nothing’s happening at the Trump podium, and doesn’t touch upon her hand signals, the light in the podium and the scrolling.


76 posted on 10/03/2016 6:29:56 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

The custom podium never should have been allowed, especially for a stupid reason like height difference. The Commission on Elections seems to also be in the tank for Hillary, the podium and Trump’s mic.


77 posted on 10/03/2016 6:32:59 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
The man in the suit who removes items at the end of the video is NOT this man, who removed documents from the podium:


78 posted on 10/03/2016 6:37:11 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Easy to follow what went on...they built her a custom podium because poor widdle Hillary needs to look as tall as her opponent, and while they made her a special model, they included an inbuilt Microsoft Word and mouse.


79 posted on 10/03/2016 6:40:02 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: bigbob; Swordmaker

ANOTHER ONE!

December 12, 1998.


80 posted on 10/03/2016 6:52:12 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson