Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkean

Other than having to put a silly sign on the door I don’t see anything wrong with this. Who wouldn’t rather have a single-user bathroom with privacy and a door that locks? Communal bathrooms contain a vast amount of wasted space and offer no advantage that I can see, we just are used to them. Maintaining a common bathroom either means they close it or you have to work around wet floors, etc. Single bathrooms can be cleaned without affecting the others.

All in all this seems like the perfect solution. Good for everyone and shuts the queers up.


7 posted on 09/29/2016 9:12:09 PM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob

What is wrong with it is having government decide what we can do or not do when it is not within the role of government. Another expansion of power for people unfit to govern.


9 posted on 09/29/2016 9:37:36 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

And the laws sounds like it says that businesses with community occupancy restrooms aren’t affected in the least (at least not by state law.)


27 posted on 10/01/2016 7:35:59 PM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson