Perhaps this could be made into a drinking game, whereby one will drink every time Hillary uses one of her specially made goal posts, trying to win "debate points" so her minions can proclaim she is the winner, which then excuses all her bribed polls to release skewed poll results clearly "proving" that Hillary won the debate and will "win" the election by XX% <-- insert whatever unbelievable number you want here.
(Always remember what we learned from Dole vs Clinton: polls can be bribed and skewed in so many ingenious and profitable ways. Pollsters don't do it because they love calling people, they do it for $$$$$$$$$$.)
Its just different versions of "AstroTurf Politics (fake grass roots politics)" and that is all we are going to get from now until election night. We all know of Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware), learn some new Latin? Voter Cavere. (Voter Be wary). At least thats what Google Translate is telling me. If you have a more accurate Latin expression, please pass it along.
That little snarky pajama boy twerp, Robby Mook, Hillary’s campaign manager, had the audacity to say, that it would be unfair for Hillary to have to be the “traffic cop” at the debate, and correct Donald Trump’s lies.
Mook was implying that Lester Holt should be “traffic cop” and point out inconsistencies or alleged falsehoods told by Trump, so as to free up Hillary to lay out her vision for America.
It would be too much to expect, per little Robby, for Hillary to have to police what Donald Trump is saying in this debate, be the traffic cop and correct factual errors expected to be said by Trump, AND also deliver her message to America.
The smartest woman in the world can’t take care of herself in a debate format????
The wonderful liberal Democrat platform doesn’t speak for itself, regardless of what Donald Trump might say or do???
Hillary isn’t rough and tough enough, to handle Donald Trump, but she will handle all the various crises which come up during the term of office of any president????
Watch Twiter absolutely explode with millions of real-time commentary. Seems like that’s both a barometer and a way to excite the populace about their candidate. I predict ideas will be what Americans are ultimately listening for: who will fight terrorism and create a sense of safety? who wants to lower taxes and cut regulatory agencies to bare bone so small business can thrive? who understands how the takeover of the banks and tightened credit by Bush and Obama caused small businesses to fold in massive numbers when they couldn’t get monthly loans to meet payroll?
Only someone who has met a payroll via collections or profits made can truly grasp why small business, the backbone of our economy, is kaput!
The crusty, smelly old pantsuit wearer will NOT win anything.
He could crush her on taxes.
More free stuff equals more taxes.
Who pays? The,poor dont because thats who the giveaway supposedly goes to.the rich dont because people,like,Clinton write the laws with loopholes theirlawyers and accountants use to preserve their wealth by putting it into things like “charitable organizations”.
So who always pays tax increases? The middle class.
Vote for her, and you are voting to cut your own throat.
closer and lower
The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing.Smiths dicta above places us as Cassandra, seeing the truth (having a modicum of "acquired wisdom and experience) but seeing so many LIVs who so prominently display the natural disposition . . . to believe. And knowing that so many of them vote.The man whom we believe is necessarily, in the things concerning which we believe him, our leader and director, and we look up to him with a certain degree of esteem and respect. But as from admiring other people we come to wish to be admired ourselves; so from being led and directed by other people we learn to wish to become ourselves leaders and directors . . .
The desire of being believed, the desire of persuading, of leading and directing other people, seems to be one of the strongest of all our natural desires. - Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)