1 posted on
09/09/2016 6:59:53 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
To: NoLibZone
Lotta Winnebagoes out there.
2 posted on
09/09/2016 7:02:50 PM PDT by
CincyRichieRich
(What about second breakfast?)
To: NoLibZone
“...laws that limited access to the drug’s chemical ingredients made it harder to manufacture it in the U.S.”
If the RATS were interested in stopping the bulk of it, they should have pushed for a capital crime law for manufacturing. Getting tough is not part of the RAT agenda...they are purely political cowards.
3 posted on
09/09/2016 7:08:32 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: NoLibZone
Meth labs hit hardest!
4 posted on
09/09/2016 7:30:28 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: NoLibZone
In our grandparents’ day....
Many judges and politicians (and the politically connected) became wealthy during prohibition.
Are we so naive that we don’t recognize the same situation exists today?
5 posted on
09/09/2016 7:30:57 PM PDT by
BAN-ONE
To: NoLibZone
How ‘bout them open borders? Awesome huh?
6 posted on
09/09/2016 8:07:12 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Let's Make Our Government and Founding Documents Great Again!)
To: NoLibZone
Sounds more like they are trying to eliminate the competition. You can’t have a War on Drugs without Drugs.
8 posted on
09/09/2016 8:45:23 PM PDT by
eyeamok
(destruction of government records.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson