To: InterceptPoint
One way is to use a very high power emitter that slightly changes frequencies constantly.
Then pepper your expected approach rout with (multiple mobile or fixed) receivers. The signal is reflected away from the target but not towards the emitter receiver. Instead, any other receivers each get a tiny part of the signal. Use the outside separate receivers to build uo a path over time.
21 posted on
09/08/2016 10:52:05 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
One way is to use a very high power emitter that slightly changes frequencies constantly. Then pepper your expected approach rout with (multiple mobile or fixed) receivers. The signal is reflected away from the target but not towards the emitter receiver. Instead, any other receivers each get a tiny part of the signal. Use the outside separate receivers to build uo a path over time.Yes. That would work. You would need some good software and a nice networked system but that shouldn't be a big deal these days.
23 posted on
09/08/2016 10:57:53 AM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you should have endorsed. Big mistake.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Then pepper your expected approach rout with (multiple mobile or fixed) receivers. The signal is reflected away from the target but not towards the emitter receiver. Instead, any other receivers each get a tiny part of the signal. The technology already exists. You have passive receivers that look for reflections of cell tower emissions.
27 posted on
09/08/2016 11:03:03 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson