Hmmm, let’s see....what could possibly be different than 2012????
- A candidate that is so bad not even the media can cover for her
- A BLACK president that, for eight years, has failed black people
- A president with policies that have failed everyone, I see nobody even talking about him...except after his apology tours
- A candidate that wants to be another 4 more years of Obama
- A world experiencing Islamic invasions, constant terrorism
- A national debt that is frightening to even think about
- A nation tired of political correctness
- A nation tired of establishment candidates
- ...and so on.
But let’s us all of the data from 2012 and assume it will hold true for 2016.
Doh!!! It’s funny to see all the political science experts doing the “turn the crank” analysis of this election. They don’t get it.
I’m not getting it....
If the sample is 32R, 28D, and 40I...and Trump is getting 90%R and 50%R, wouldn’t that put him in the 48-49 range already with the small crossover Dem putting him over 50? Even skewing to 2012, it shouldn’t help Hillary enough with Indies that high and Trump solidifying his R numbers.
What am I missing?
A portion of the 2012 electorate won’t show up this time around ‘cause nobody who looks like them is running. Another portion of the same demographic will vote Trump because they do want to work and see him helping make that possible.
PMSNBC is a loser.