Posted on 09/04/2016 6:10:02 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael
Question for the PC employees of professional sports, PC employees of universities, and PC employees of the media including PC employees of the MSM.. if interracial crime is almost entirely white on black.. well The federal government published interracial crime data for years and years prior to Obama taking office. Where's the brief?
I have posted NCVS data showing interracial crime that refutes the PC Administration, PC employees of professional sports, PC employees of universities, and PC employees of the media including PC employees of the MSM contention that interracial crime is almost entirely white on black. It appears that since 2009 those data are no longer made public however.
I honestly believe that it is solely because NCVS has for years and years showed black-on-white violence much greater than white-on-black. PC is just making the problems worse by lying about it. NCVS data amd links to source.
Here is the FBI new not fully implemented National Incident-based Reporting System that shows crimes by race of victim and race of offender but not together; just here's a count of victims and here's a count of offenders.
The puzzle is that
I do not understand how NIBRS assigns values to victims and offenders but that sure seems odd.
The unPC, unthinkable, forbidden thought is that the surplus of black offenders are beating up the surplus of white victims. That matches the suppressed (?) data of NCVS -- since 2009 those data are no longer made public that I can find.
year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 888,744 | 378,912 | +121,747 | -83,288 |
2012 | 893,984 | 374,220 | +125,837 | -78,657 |
2013 | 860,059 | 370,169 | +125,669 | -74,636 |
2014 | 842,267 | 358711 | +125,717 | -69,008 |
2015 | N | N | N | N |
NIBRS You can select National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) at step 4, in Persons Arrested (UCR Publications www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr-publications#Crime) below. Then
The current regime sees the disparity as simply reparations and not a problem at all. They are even stirring up the perceived grievances to increase reparations.
Democrat politicians have no souls. They are very obviously stirring up violent emotions against white persons. Anyone who listens to Collin Flaherty can see many, many documented crimes against whites. These attacks arise to the category of atrocities.
In Eric Holder's locker at the DNC locker room.
What may be a concern one day is when enough whites are armed and not being victims anymore, the libs will say that the carrying of firearms is racist.
And nothing stimulates libs to promote policy and legislation like that word.
Democrats keep using that word “racist” because it has worked so well for them. It keeps black people angry and white people feeling guilty. So it increases the black vote while suppressing the white vote...such as: “You don’t want to vote for the Republicans. That would make you a RACIST!” So they keep both the black voters and the white voters on the Democrat plantation. I am shocked that so many white people have continued to vote for Democrats for 50 years when it has been obvious for a long time that Democrats are disrespecting the white Democrat voters. It seems however, that the arrogance of the Democrats are finally making a mark on the white Democrat voters.
If the Democrats ever got their reparations through, how would it work out? Would the reparations be collected through the IRS? That would send all of that money to the federal government. Then the Dems could get their sticky fingers on TRILLIONS of dollars. With the Democrats always follow the money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.