Replies

My take:

Huma is in a lesbian relationship with Hillary and married Weiner as a beard, with the offer of power (he wanted to be the major of New York). He is caught in a loveless marriage with no real female company. It was all about coverage for Hillary and the deal he made was not worth it, though his seeking of power made it seem so. Yes he was/is a pervert but I have to wonder if he was getting taken care of at home if he would be off doing the on-line pervert thing, it strikes me as a fellow who is very lonely and has no normal femal physical or emotional comfort.

I would not be surprised if the most recent issue was a set up by the Dems. He has to be gotten out of the way for Huma to be free to be with Hillary on a 24/7 basis. Also it seems in the past whenever they can pin cheating on a guy it helps with the sympathy vote, this is awfully convenient for Huma as she is the focus of a lot of attention right now.

If it comes up next that Bill Clinton had some indiscretion in recent years you know it is all a set up to allow the first openly lesbian couple to mount the Imperial throne. Apparently a lot of women will vote on sympathy alone.

Lastly Huma could not be a lesbian at all but an agent. There is something way too cold about this entire affair. If she had married Weiner for love there would have been big changes in that family once it was determined he was off, instead Huma spends all her time with Hillary. Normal people do not behave that way, but a person who was an agent would not hesitate to use and discard folks once no longer convenient. Huma seems to be intent upon Hillary at all costs and Hillarie’s recent screech about how Trump would exclude all 1.5 billion Muslims from the US stuck me as the comment of a person who takes it personal. Why?Something is rotten in that entire Hillary-Huma connection.

Of course the above is the ultimate in cynicalconjecture, but sometimes what appears to be a duck actually is a duck.