Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: D Rider

He is re-weighting the poll so that it reflects the demographics of the expected turnout. No conspiracy here.


3 posted on 08/22/2016 3:42:34 PM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

Standard media cover up. Nothing to see here...


11 posted on 08/22/2016 4:07:32 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke

“He is re-weighting the poll so that it reflects the demographics of the expected turnout. No conspiracy here.”

Maybe and that is what I think are wrong with these polls. I don’t think you can reweigh the polls based on say the 2012 voting sample. I think there will be a lot of crossover votes for one example.


17 posted on 08/22/2016 4:34:38 PM PDT by Parley Baer (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke

I don’t think it would change by 4% if it was only to reflect demographics.


26 posted on 08/22/2016 6:37:34 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke
He is re-weighting the poll so that it reflects the demographics of the expected turnout. No conspiracy here.

If one was truly interested in determining "expected turnout" they would look at the enthusiasm gap instead of past races. He should have increased the Republican values because no one is excited about hillary.

28 posted on 08/23/2016 7:57:55 AM PDT by BubbaBasher ("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson