Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-SEAL Who Wrote Book On Bin Laden Raid Forfeits $6.8 Million To Settle Criminal Probes
http://pubx.co/bftjG4 ^ | 8/19/16 | Christopher Drew

Posted on 08/19/2016 3:19:14 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus

Edited on 08/19/2016 6:04:52 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Matt Bissonnette, a former member of Navy SEAL Team 6 who wrote an account of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, agreed on Friday to forfeit $6.8 million in book royalties and speaking fees and apologized for failing to clear his disclosures with the Pentagon, according to federal court documents.


(Excerpt) Read more at pubx.co ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: bissonnette; dod; nationalsecurity; navyseal; pentagon; seal; security; specops; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2016 3:19:14 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Meanwhile, Clinton gets a pass.


2 posted on 08/19/2016 3:20:36 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

No evidence of **intent** —no crime, no tort.

He never said he meant to, keept the 6.8 mil.


3 posted on 08/19/2016 3:21:58 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

IIRC, several in the administration were running their mouths about the Osama raid.


4 posted on 08/19/2016 3:22:15 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus
The Justice Department conducted criminal investigations into whether Mr. Bissonnette had disclosed classified information in his book or speeches

Nothing he printed in the book or in a speech was marked classified at the time they were written.

5 posted on 08/19/2016 3:23:10 PM PDT by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

I was always surprised he didn’t get into more trouble.
I remain surprised he hasn’t been hunted down by wannabe-jihadists.


6 posted on 08/19/2016 3:29:05 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus
In the end, the department did not bring any criminal charges, settling instead for the cash forfeitures.

IOWs they didn't find any classified information in his book but they did find his bank account.

7 posted on 08/19/2016 3:31:40 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Our government lies and the media helps them.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

This sounds like treating a criminal case like a civil one. What gives?


8 posted on 08/19/2016 3:35:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Nero Germanicus

Too bad the FBI was not responsibile for the investigation. Your intent would have been more important.


10 posted on 08/19/2016 3:36:13 PM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Employ the Clinton defense.


11 posted on 08/19/2016 3:38:51 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Wouldn’t the Clinton Defense apply in his case?


12 posted on 08/19/2016 3:40:50 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

It sounds to me like they want to ruin him to send a message.


13 posted on 08/19/2016 3:42:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Our government lies and the media helps them.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; LucyT; Liz; WildHighlander57; Jane Long

Heads up!


14 posted on 08/19/2016 3:43:00 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

“Meanwhile, Clinton gets a pass.”

Two posts, not bad.

5.56mm


15 posted on 08/19/2016 3:43:55 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

That is sooo wrong


16 posted on 08/19/2016 3:45:10 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

And so it becomes a question of muscle, not of justice or fairness.

If the criminal law says he oughtn’t have acted in this fashion, then a criminal penalty not a tort remedy seems to be the right thing to do.


17 posted on 08/19/2016 3:45:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

settling instead for the cash forfeitures....In other words, Clinton Foundation bribes.


18 posted on 08/19/2016 3:48:03 PM PDT by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Who gets the money?


19 posted on 08/19/2016 3:51:33 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

That would be the logical and ethical way to look at it, yes.

And if you keep that up they might find your bank account too!


20 posted on 08/19/2016 3:55:08 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Our government lies and the media helps them.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson