I kind of find this to be distasteful and not on point, as to the multitude of things that make her a poor candidate to be POTUS. JMHO
Agree. It’s quite un Freeperlike material IMO.
Yeah well I just play by the rule book Dems wrote. They win. I wanna win this time. Distaste and on point can wait until next time when this country isn’t flat lining.
As I’m pushing 90 myself, I find this attack below the belt! (no pun intended).
I find her existence distasteful-but if she has brain-damage that affects her bodily functions...a brain damaged candidate for President. Does anyone think that is a good thing???
I find her existence distasteful-but if she has brain-damage that affects her bodily functions...a brain damaged candidate for President. Does anyone think that is a good thing???
I agree ... this tack is distasteful. I wouldn’t care if Trump wore Depends - unless the incontinence was cause by an underlying condition that might affect his ability to govern.
The candidate's health when running for POTUS, especially when there is strong evidence that that person's health is extremely poor, is fair game ever since the lefty media harped about Reagan's age.
As one who suffered through the years of the "arkansas mafia" (closer to the truth than the public wishes to admit) while William Jefferson Blythe [clinton] sold missile guidance technology to the chicoms, and he cavorted with interns and call girls, rented out the Lincoln Bedroom, etc., etc., etc. I can assure you that EVERYTHING CONCERNING THE CLINTONS IS "DISTASTEFUL". May I suggest that you skip to the next article if the subject offends your sensitivities.
Believe me if the shoe (or in this case, Depends) were on the other foot there would be no end of the left broaching the subject.
Agreed. But let us understand that she is an ailing old lady with health issues.
Disagree, it's NOT distasteful IF TRUE. The voters are entitled to some understanding of her medical issues, because serious physical impairments, which we have good reason to believe exist, could logically have a negative influence on her capability of functioning in office as POTUS.
As things are, her own campaign is obviously keeping her medical status under wraps, so FReepers who post TRUE facts about it are performing valuable a public service which would otherwise be neglected. Voters have reason to take her medical issues into account as one of many factors when making their decision in the upcoming election.
I do too.......Hopefully this thread will be pulled.
If I found out that Margaret Thatcher or Jeane Kirkpatrick wore diapers or had catheters it would not change my opinion of them. However, I do not think Hillary has come clean about her health. Any Republican candidate woul have been instantly deemed unqualified and forced out of the race if they were absent from the debate stage following a break.
Absolutely agree with you, I have noticed the decline of civil discourse on FReeRepublic. Thinking the Twiitter and Facebook has changed the way people think and correspond.