While I believe Hillary has medical problems as discussed, I want higher quality proof.
Snopes’s evaluation is as useful as tits on a boar.
I've found Snopes to be politically biased to the left. A few years ago, a businessman named Feldkamp who lived in Southern California and owned a chain of abortion clinics lost two of his daughters (one of whom was five months pregnant), their husbands, and their four small children, when the private plane they were flying in inexplicably crashed into a Catholic cemetery, next to a tomb for the unborn. It was a horrible story that got extensive coverage. Anyway, Snopes investigated whether Feldkamp did indeed own abortion clinics and deemed that “unproven”. Well, it was a fact that Feldkamp owned abortion clinics, and that was easily verifiable. Why did Snopes not verify it? Evidently, a handful of people saw the hand of God in the plane having crashed near a tomb of the unborn. Well, you don't have to think THAT means anything, but it is s fact that Feldkamp owned abortion clinics. My point is, Snopes can't be trusted if an issue is at all political.