More specifically, the Supreme Court clarified in United States v. Cruikshank that the states required only the feds and the states, not individual citizens, to respect the personal rights which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect.
Corrections, insights welcome.
>
More specifically, the Supreme Court clarified in United States v. Cruikshank that the states required only the feds and the states, not individual citizens, to respect the personal rights which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect.
>
Come now. We all KNOW nothing older than ~1910, let alone the Constitution itself, is ever used as a basis for Judicial rulings....it’s all precedent\’case law’.
Next you’ll be telling us the Voting Rights Act is void on 9th/10th A. grounds and biz, such as this, are have the power, nay RIGHT, to prohibit anyone access of ‘public accommodations’!