Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Purdue77

Even so, the Hubble would have been cheaper to replace than repair it with a Shuttle mission.

In my original post I said a SpaceX mission would be improbable, but cool if it could be done.

BTW, the Falcon 9 now has 1.7 million pounds of thrust at launch.

“Think of this though. If we had something that could retrieve and return payloads from space, the Chinese and others would be claiming that we had a space weapon.”

Did you know that was one of the primary capabilities of the Shuttle? It was to launch from Vandenberg, snag Soviet satellites out of polar orbit and return to California all in one orbit before it could be detected. That’s why the Shuttle wings were overly large, so it could glide back to California to compensate for Earth rotation during the mission.


21 posted on 08/03/2016 9:54:24 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
Did you know that was one of the primary capabilities of the Shuttle?

Actually I didn't. And which satellites were the intended targets?

My first assignment in the USAF was at VAFB working on the space shuttle program. That mission doesn't sound familiar. But, if we were going to snag Russian satellites it would have been above my classification at that time.

22 posted on 08/03/2016 10:29:39 AM PDT by Purdue77 (We got robbed!! Hillary for Prosecution and Prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson