[rktman]

Sadly, there are to few people who have any clue about Agenda 21 and the subsequent "agreements" that will stifle people wherever they are. I ain't no expert on it by any means but from what I've seen on it, it ain't purty. The rockin' u.n. and one worlders want to control every aspect of your being. Sound familiar?

[SatinDoll]

I’m from the Pacific Northwest and the story isn’t quite what you make it out to be. He built a reservoir and did not get a permit.

About Agenda 21, you’re are correct. Those people who work in land use planning here are all supporters of the U.N.

[onedoug]

Kerry believes in air conditioning for the elite. The little people must sweat it out.

[Dr.Deth]

Back when people were educated with critical thinking skills, a politician trying to take away your natural rights in order to ostensibly control the weather would have been lowered into bubbling creosote. An agent coming on to his property to enforce regulations about collecting the freakin' rain would have been sent home with a pantload of buttshot.

[ntnychik]

Skeptics should go to their local planning board meeting. They will probably be “facilitated” by a jovial person trained in Delphi techniques, manipulating the attendees into a predetermined outcome. The board will want inviting federal grants from HUD, so will be inclined to agree with low income housing injected into prosperous neighborhoods, bike paths (connecting poor areas to prosperous areas), roundabouts, mass transportation schemes, etc.

Our consultant was Sustainable Transportation Systems of Ithaca, NY. I invoked panic in our town supervisor and STS facilitator when I asked if they intended to use eminent domain to acquire the land and rights of way for the proposed bike path. He said the land would be contributed out of good will. He dodged four times on the proposed route of the path.

Our supervisor was quoted in the paper as saying there was no discussion about the bike path. At our meeting, the supervisor referred to the HUD grant money, and answered detractors with “this is going through,
regardless.”

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

There needs to be an alternative scheme. Let’s call it Agenda 2025.

Phase I is to encourage the China to build their own version of the United Nations, in Beijing, with the idea that the UN would move there for an indeterminate period of time, say 50 years.

Phase II is to encourage Russia to build their own version of the United Nations, in Moscow, with the idea that once the UN had been in Beijing for 50 years, it would move to Moscow for the next 50.

The purpose of doing this is twofold. First, to be rid of these parasitical insects. But second, neither the Chinese nor the Russians would have a fraction of the tolerance the US has given to the UNs antics.

Granted, this is like wishing hemorrhoids on the Chinese and Russians, but their egos are so great perhaps they cannot resist.