I have said several times - any company in the United States that makes a product that is discovered to be tainted in any way is fully expected to issue a recall on such product - even if there is bacteria in 30 out of 30000 products. This is accepted as normal practice by business because the infinitesimal chance that a consumer would be harmed by it would result in bankrupting lawsuits and damage to the brand.
Yet, we have a politician running for President who supported as Sec of State and who will support as President the immigration of millions - yes millions - of people vulnerable to Islamic Jihadist behavior who probably represent an even bigger risk than giving us a bad case of the runs. Where is the logic in this or do the results (presumably democratic voters now and in the future) justify the risks to our citizens?
Too bad we can’t sue the politicians for the results!
corrected tagline