What say you?
There’s word that she shared SoS info to her son in law who ran a hedge fund.
However, he opened up one for Greek investments and it tanked when that country went down the tubes.
Apparently (look up the 100 page 4chan document) Chelsea is up to her neck in the foundation, which is an elaborate money laundering scam.
Why do that?
” IT’S EASY TO CHECK.”
then check it and answer your question :)
It’s how Clintons have done it in the past. They got secret info to the Chinese by letting them “steal” it in the 90s. They got paid back with campaign contributions.
Hell...I said that a year ago!
That was my first thought when I heard about it several months ago. This is a great way to sell state secrets.
imo, everything is for sale with hildabeast.
if the price is right she’ll sell chelsea & her grand kids.
That was the REASON for the private server, pay a fee, get the password.
I’m going to say probably not, because she wouldn’t have kept personal information on it if she had sold access.
I am strongly convinced that she sold both documents and policy, but not by this method. Remember, she was Secretary of State, and that means she can stuff whatever she wants into a diplomatic pouch and have it delivered anywhere in the world.
If there was a buck to be made you can bet she did it.
In the old days, if a person with a TS/SCI clearance left a briefcase in a bar everyday for years, had an affair or a nap or whatever in the back room, then returned and picked up the briefcase, that person, when caught, would not be able to claim they had no idea that the briefcase might have been compromised by foreign intel. services.
What Hillary did was far worse. She left TS/SCI/SAP documents open for anybody to read.
I assume that the Russians, Chinese and Iranians are now in a position to blackmail her. The FBI might not have been able to recover 30K deleted emails, but our enemies were reading (and saving) them in real time.
Quite simply, no.
If she did, the information would have been carefully secured and only those with approved access would have been able to find it. There is plenty of information available to prove that was not the case here.
Since it’s easy to check, could you please do that and let us know what you find?
It’s NOT easy to check, and if the check yielded a “yes”, then so what? That ship has sailed.
She proffered her services directly.
Giving out her ‘personal’ email address would be enough... anyone worth their salt could hack it from there.
Most, if not all, Obama Admin high level appointees have been using private email accounts to send and receive sensitive and classified information on non secure private systems and networks in order to avoid FOIA disclosure
Very excellent question. I Tweeted it to Jake Tapper & Chuck Todd (not that they’ll respond).
You just now figured that out?
No other reason makes sense...
Testifying before Congress, AG Lynch dodged, bobbed, and weaved on a simple question:
Is it illegal to hand off classified materials to someone who does not hold a security clearance?
Demand Congress follow-up using these questions:
* Hillary was allowed to disclose classified data to others not holding security clearances, including her inner circle, her own attorneys and other aides outside the State Department.
* Are there documents that Hillary's inner circle were shown that the Congressional Committee is not allowed to see?
* Can the Congressional committee see those same documents, un- redacted, as Hillary showed them to others?
* Since there was no criminal intent on Hillary's part (according to Comey), and criminal intent is required (according to Comey), what criminal intent would be necessary to show the oversight Committee the same documents?
* Why can't the Congressional committee see everything?
* Where there documents so sensitive that the FBI investigators did not hold a high enough security clearance to view the materials - and who actually DID review the materials?
* What if Hillary gave those documents to the Committee - would that simply be careless....... or would it be criminal? ....and would Comey give Congress a pass?