Posted on 07/24/2016 8:15:26 AM PDT by stockpirate
My concern is did Hillary sell access to her server? Did she give out the password in exchange for gain or favors?
This is the one question I haven't heard anyone ask.
DID SHE GET PAID TO ALLOW OTHERS TO HAVE ACCESS TO HER SERVER, IT'S EASY TO CHECK.
What say you?
There’s word that she shared SoS info to her son in law who ran a hedge fund.
However, he opened up one for Greek investments and it tanked when that country went down the tubes.
Apparently (look up the 100 page 4chan document) Chelsea is up to her neck in the foundation, which is an elaborate money laundering scam.
Why do that?
” IT’S EASY TO CHECK.”
then check it and answer your question :)
The server didn’t need to be hacked if she sold access to it.
It’s how Clintons have done it in the past. They got secret info to the Chinese by letting them “steal” it in the 90s. They got paid back with campaign contributions.
Hell...I said that a year ago!
Could check timing of donations to the Clinton Foundation for clues.
That was my first thought when I heard about it several months ago. This is a great way to sell state secrets.
The same way spies used to meet buyers in a city park and had the information hidden in a briefcase that was swapped.
Easy access to information for the buyer.
I have thought this for some time.
imo, everything is for sale with hildabeast.
if the price is right she’ll sell chelsea & her grand kids.
That was the REASON for the private server, pay a fee, get the password.
I’m going to say probably not, because she wouldn’t have kept personal information on it if she had sold access.
I am strongly convinced that she sold both documents and policy, but not by this method. Remember, she was Secretary of State, and that means she can stuff whatever she wants into a diplomatic pouch and have it delivered anywhere in the world.
If there was a buck to be made you can bet she did it.
“if the price is right she’ll sell chelsea & her grand kids.”
For a few dollar more ... as Resident, she’ll sell the rest of us ...
It did if she wanted at least quasi-plausible deniability. Like telling some thief the location and type of safe for the house so you can get the insurance money for covered items. The difference here would be the thief actually paying or ‘donating openly’ to a fungible charity you run for the info about the safe.
Freegards
In the old days, if a person with a TS/SCI clearance left a briefcase in a bar everyday for years, had an affair or a nap or whatever in the back room, then returned and picked up the briefcase, that person, when caught, would not be able to claim they had no idea that the briefcase might have been compromised by foreign intel. services.
What Hillary did was far worse. She left TS/SCI/SAP documents open for anybody to read.
I assume that the Russians, Chinese and Iranians are now in a position to blackmail her. The FBI might not have been able to recover 30K deleted emails, but our enemies were reading (and saving) them in real time.
Quite simply, no.
If she did, the information would have been carefully secured and only those with approved access would have been able to find it. There is plenty of information available to prove that was not the case here.
Since it’s easy to check, could you please do that and let us know what you find?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.