Posted on 07/15/2016 10:47:46 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
Archaeologist think nothing ever happened before they themselves were born.
Maybe they didn’t cruise there. Maybe they just crawled onto the land from the sea and evolved there independently.
I have a problem with bearskin sails from Africa.
Still waiting for your take on this.....
Note: this topic is from . Thanks Fractal Trader.
The sediments that contain the footprints suggest they probably date to the period immediately before this, at about 5.7m years.
“The Morons today think Ancient Humans were Morons”
There’s more flat earthers running amok now than there were then. ‘Idiocracy’ turned out to be a documentary.
“The Morons today think Ancient Humans were Morons”
There’s more flat earthers running amok now than there were then. ‘Idiocracy’ turned out to be a documentary.
Fun post. Thanks
There is this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_maritime_history
lots of fun articles from boffins about ‘new’ ancient history.
I would really like this to be true, because I am a firm believer than man was indeed seafaring long before we think they were. But being objective and knowing some geology about Quartz, the artifacts do not appear to be manmade. Quartz tends to naturally fracture off of dikes and veins with those shapes as very common because of it’s crystalline structure.
And the weathering appears to be much much more than a very young 130k in geology standards. I could go out and collect a hundred from a local vein that look just like that. So unfortunately this whole find revolves around whether those are geofacts or not and I lean heavily towards geofacts.
Thanks for the ping on this!
A 'prehistoric shoreline' found high upon a bluff would seem to me to indicate that it must have been so prior to the last ice age since later the sea levels were supposedly much lower than today. {Confirms earlier chronology}
My pleasure. This was originally posted during my FR quarantine, and I'd not seen it 'til now. Be sure to visit the similar and related topics from the FRchives.
Some related keywords, borrowed from another topic and edited:
Thanks!
You were nearly 4 years late on this one.
Yeah, I wasn't available on FR for an entire year, I guess you didn't miss me... [breaks quarantine rules by wiping eyes]
Ping
Population crossed at much earlier date, when Med was lower than today, perhaps short haul, line of sight, island hopping.
The future population had enough sense to move their community to higher ground as water rose to points higher than today, rather than drown.
The higher water reduced total area of island, reducing carrying capacity; climate would also be affected, maybe adversely affecting traditional food sources, so population became to low to sustain itself, and died out?Fresh water sources became scarcer?
Rising water & sedimentation joined in wiping out any trace of earlier, (and probably still submerged) lower sites?
Maybe “artifacts” are misinterpreted?
Humans have navigated open water for at least 800K years. No one walked to Crete, ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.