Posted on 07/03/2016 9:57:04 AM PDT by Ray76
(Sep 9, 2015) As a former Justice Department official, I have, of late, been asked by both Democratic and Republican friends whether Hillary Clinton could be indicted for her email related actions. The simple answer is yes she, and perhaps some of her senior staff, could be indicted for violating a number of federal criminal statutes.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
All good points.
Regarding intent, I think it is beyond question that she intended to avoid both scrutiny and record retention.
While campaigning for the Senate in 2000, Hillary Rodham Clinton told dinner guests at a fundraiser, I dont do email. As much as Ive been investigated and all of that, you know, why would I I dont even want why would I ever want to do e-mail?
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=QApICxqiZcw#t=197
Report: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/4/hillary-clinton-2000-i-dont-do-email/
Understanding that an utterly corrupt administration won't indict one of its own isn't defeatism, it's reality.
“The simple answer is yes she, and perhaps some of her senior staff, could be indicted for violating a number of federal criminal statutes.
What most of us want to know is how could they not be indicted for violating a number of federal criminal statutes?
Where can we get a Get Out Of Indictment Free card?”
I agree that obama will pardon hilllary IF she is indicted, rules and laws are made for peons like us , not for royalty, (in their minds) like them. The only time we are worth anything is when it comes to voting them BACK INTO OFFICE.
“Although she has claimed nothing was “marked classified” (which actually turned out to be false)”
This has been wordplay on her part since the beginning. The government does not the word “classified” to designate sensitive material:
Typical classification levels
Top Secret -Top secret is the highest level of classified information.
Secret
Confidential
Restricted
Official
She has been lying about this since day one and the MSM and the GOP never called her on it. A shame really, because she has said it so many times that most Americans have heard her say it. A simple take down regarding this would register well with the voters and they would know and understand right away the lie.
You're not agreeing with me since I never said that.
Clinton was “read in” to SCI, and signed a separate NDA agreement. All of this would have been explained to her.
People in high places, including Judge Jeannie, have agreed that she will never be indicted. When is the last time a Clinton got in trouble for their crimes? And I will mention Loral because I thought it was treason and nothing happened. And I recall during impeachment when the perjurer gave his State of the Union speech that was full of total bull$shit and afterwards Trent Lott declared impeachment was over. They were impressed with a bull$shit speech??? I'm disgusted with the whole group of them...the doers and the enablers. I bet most of the GOP is just trying to figure out how they can get away with as much - how can they become mega rich while on the public payroll. And I'm not blaming the FBI - by all reports these people are livid at what's going on. It's the uniparty party that controls the power and decides who is to big to jail.
Well said ‘76. That is just the give up ‘surrender monkey’ type crap that has helped get us to this place.
http://www.dineshdsouza.com/movies/hillarys-america/
HILLARY’S AMERICA: THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
There is a line in it that says it all...the system is designed to go after the little guy; the system doesn’t go after the big guys, because the system is designed by the big guys.
Bttt
Yup... Just like exempting themselves from obamacare. They aren’t even ashamed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.