Posted on 05/19/2016 1:36:22 PM PDT by XXXoholic
Thirteen minutes of Hillary Clinton's words are coming back to haunt her thanks to a YouTube video that recently went viral. Created by YouTube user Michael Armstrong, the video shows the likely Democratic presidential nominee expressing a variety of positions on various political issues over the years. Armstrong also left a message on the video, after it was picked up by the Drudge Report – it wasn't meant to be a partisan hit job. 'PSA: This is not a pro-Trump video,' the creator wrote. 'Don't worry, he's next.'
How can anyone with a brain vote for the woman?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Only 13 minutes? Must be the heavily abridged version.
‘Don’t worry, he’s next.’
Won’t matter, as I guarantee it will make us laugh...
There's absolutely no way I could listen to Shrillary for 13 minutes.
“Only 13 minutes? Must be the heavily abridged version.”
Yep.
It’s actually very good and informative. You will almost feel sorry for her. ;) (I said “ALMOST”)
For average democrats, it’s simply “whatever D gets my vote”. They don’t think, and don’t believe anything political in news or whatever. Just D. If you ask about, why not R? They’ll give you two or three myths that have stuck out in the past few years thanks to our MSM.
Honestly if the media were not biased left, democrats would have been toast 20 years ago. Seems like they may be hitting their breaking point this election. :)
They don’t deserve to be knocked down, they deserve to be run out of the country, humiliated and destroyed.
Well, changing positions over issues over time is not necessarily a character flaw - it could be a sign of a teachable person. So don’t get too crazy about this because Trump has also changed his positions partly because he’s changed his role from businessman seeking to maximize company profits to a political officer pledged to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and America.
But there’s gotta be a bunch of statements on video that she has made that aren’t merely a change of mind about an issue, but outright lies about a factual matter.
I feel the same. There is something about the way she talks that is painful to listen to. Obama also with his robot like emphasis on the last word in every sentence. And this is not because of their ideology. I don’t have the same reaction to the very left Sanders.
” presidential nominee expressing a variety of positions on various political issues over the years.”
If your positions on political issues never varies; you are likely a robotic ideologue. A political leader must be responsive to changing circumstances; therefore many of his or her positions will likely change over time.
(Note: the above comment was made without reference to anything in the video — which, in the best of FR traditions, I did not view, before commenting. Therefore, this is absolutely NOT to be construed as a defence of HRC, or any of her despicable behaviours.)
Im ok with actually changing positions. Hillary just lies.
Changing your opinion or reaching new conclusions based on new evidence is a good thing. Trump doesn’t deny his past positions.
On the other hand, Hitlery denies she ever held a contrary position. I could only stand to listen for a few seconds, but this video shows that with respect to her position on gay marriage.
I started typing my post #11, before your post appeared here. I agree with all your points.
Distinguishing between changing an opinion, when new facts come to light — and outright lying on factual matters, is important. Thanks for mentioning that.
Yeah but it's going to be completely taken out of context. There is a huge difference between being a career politician and a real estate developer kissing liberal butt so you can get building permits.
did she actually fart in that debate?
Yeah on one side you got total liars. Like: “Yes, the terrorist attacks shows we are making progress” and “No we are not cramming this transgender bathroom policy down your throats! No we are responding to well intended school districts who have been asking us to clarify what bathrooms children should use!”.
On the other you have someone whom some people don’t like how he talks.
Rough choice.
Thing is if a PUBBIE tried saying: “Yeah, another terrorist attack proves our approach is working” the press would never let him or her get away with it!!!!
If her lips are moving...
As Rush brought out today, she has the unattractive woman vote. I can vouch for this as a certain female co-worker who is walleyed, speaks with a scratchy hillary voice, sporting a very butch, prematurely grey hair do with coke bottle glasses has referred to shrillary as the next prez.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.