Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring
much of the glacier is already underwater; its melting will have no effect on sea level.

If any of the glacier is resting on the bottom, this is not true. Obviously a sufficiently large piece of ice will overflow a glass of water when it melts.

28 posted on 05/18/2016 5:57:49 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: wideminded

I was referring to the melting of the part underwater.


37 posted on 05/18/2016 6:03:35 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: wideminded
Obviously a sufficiently large piece of ice will overflow a glass of water when it melts.

Oh Noes!
Does that mean I'm drinking too fast?

Oh, Yeah...You're wrong.

[Check out how much of that significant ice is below versus how much is above the waterline, then reflect on displacement and on water's expanding when it freezes/contracting when it melts.]

59 posted on 05/18/2016 6:47:58 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson