“It is a myth”
You started out talking about a “genuine hermaphrodite”, then you changed the subject to who and who is not a “true hermaphrodite”, and now you are trying to claim a “true hermaphrodite” is a myth and does not exist because there are no documented cases of being self impregnated. Those comments are wrong and represent a strawman argument, because you are misrepresenting the definition of an hermaphrodite as requiring self impregnation, when in reality the term encompasses a wide variety of different conditions which result in the presence of ovarian and testicular tissue without being fully functional.
“There has never been a fully functional male and female in the same human body ever documented”
The definition of an hermaphrodite or true hermaphrodite has never required the full functionality of the testicular and ovarian tissues, much less a capability for self impregnation.
[....]
“But never a true hermaphrodite that I’ve ever read of documented”
The definition of an hermaphrodite or true hermaphrodite has never required the full functionality of the testicular and ovarian tissues, much less a capability for self impregnation. Consequently, your objections are the actual myth.
In biology, a hermaphrodite is an organism that has reproductive organs normally associated with both male and female sexes
a man with ovary trails is not an hermaphrodite, but he does have hermaphroditic characteristics
But that doesn’t make him an hermaphrodite
I have gigantism characteristics at six foot six but I’m not a giant
I try to be precise but this is not a real big issue to me other than that homosexuals have appropriated it as a cause celebrè like it’s common when in fact it is indeed a myth
But go ahead use the term as you wish