To: Teacher317
the GOP found a way to make sure that they didn't or couldn't attack his weak spots, and handed him the victory.
Obama was certainly a stronger candidate than HRC. Q.E.D.
besides his beating her in a head-to-head, he is a MUCH better speaker, MUCH more charismatic, was not defined for the general masses, and had an automatic melanin enhanced minority turnout machine built into his skin.
Also, I said that HRC was very weak. Romney was remarkably weaker still, as the GOP was determined to pick the ONLY Republican in the whole country who could not plausibly run against Obamacare. That was so bad, it was skillful.
Either Trump or Cruz is willing to attack the opponent as needed, unlike McCain or Romney. Look at Bush '88 to see how its done.
70 posted on
04/29/2016 11:07:56 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit."-R.Reagan)
To: Dr. Sivana
Hillary stands no chance in the fall, anyone telling you that is LYING. They are saying it to prop up her base and keep them engaged, she has no shot at winning the general election. McCain had a better shot at winning than Hillary does.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson