Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 867V309

tomato is a fruit.

Exactly. The first sentence distracted me from reading the rest of the article. If the nutritionist didn’t know that, I am not sure I can trust the rest of what they have to say.


15 posted on 04/24/2016 8:31:44 PM PDT by boycott (--s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: boycott

That is the writer’s interpretation of what the nutritionist said. The actual report is probably available online if you search. He might have used the word “produce” instead of “vegetable” before proceeding to mention tomatoes, apricots, watermelon.


42 posted on 04/24/2016 9:55:23 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: boycott; 867V309
tomato is a fruit.

Exactly. The first sentence distracted me from reading the rest of the article. If the nutritionist didn’t know that, I am not sure I can trust the rest of what they have to say.

A "botanical" fruit is not necessarily a "culinary" one, and a "culinary" fruit is not necessarily a "botanical" one. The Tomato Distinction is never even consistently made by its followers--only rarely do people mention cucumbers and peppers, even more rarely do people mention different uses of the word "fruit," and no one ever seriously says things for any other category, like "lettuce is leaves, not a vegetable" or "a beet is a root, not a vegetable."

So it is that wben I find the insistence that "the tomato is actually a fruit," I find myself distracted in similar fashion.

64 posted on 04/27/2016 6:41:49 AM PDT by Lonely Bull ("When he is being rude or mean it drives people _away_ from his confession and _towards_ yours.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson