Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber
It does not mean everyone will be educated, it means diplomas are meaningless and prospective employers will have to figure out which of the new applicants absorbed anything useful in college and/or if they can be trained.

11 posted on 04/23/2016 5:09:33 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BitWielder1
it means diplomas are meaningless and prospective employers will have to figure out which of the new applicants absorbed anything useful in college and/or if they can be trained

You mean, like now.

I'm paying for college now, and in a year, I'll be paying for two kids, and due to close age spacing, I'll be paying for two until 2024, when I drop back to one.

I'm glad I can afford it, but, truth be told, the pricing is absurd, the differences between private schools in the same brackets (Bates-Bowdoin-Colby, Williams-Wesleyan-Amherst, Bucknell-Lehigh-Lafayette, Kenyon-Oberlin-Denison, etc) HAS to result from price-fixing.

If it were free, everybody would be paying much higher taxes, but the travesty of non-STEM "education" really wouldn't change all that much, IMO. The horrible results predicted by the anti-Bernie people are already here, in spades.

18 posted on 04/23/2016 5:24:02 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Ryan never could have outfought Trump. I never knew, until this day, that it was Romney all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson