Any Christian that needs to look to a flesh man for protection is NOT a Christian. We are adults and have been lied to by generations of fake Christians that have nearly stripped US blind.
Yawn.
Brown. That spot in your underwear
Wow! Townhall is NON-stop aren’t they? Give it a break....at least for ONE day!
There you go let’s all vote for Hillary. Problem solved.
Save your time, most of us don’t read crap.
Trump for President.
What’s the recommended alternative?
Hillary Clinton?
I feel bad for all the “no exceptions” people who have been lied to all these years by the GOP about what is possible.
Michael Brown needs to face reality.
Hitlery (or worse, Bernie) will be on my ballot in November.
Someone else will be, too.
Michael Brown, who should be voted for in that real life scenario?
what a stupid premise for an idiot article.
You don’t look to men for protection of your Christian values if you are a Christian.
But if you want protection from earthly enemies, I’ll take Trump’s protection against ISIS who will cut your throat over some namby-pampy politician who is worried about bathrooms.
Well Ted Cruz sure is nobody’s protector either.
Christians stand on their own two feet.
They know who their real protector is.
Staffed in all 50 states.
Ticked off base.
Be at the birth of a brand new conservative party?
HISTORIC.
What are we waiting for?
And just think of the chaos....
Jedi.
“hes the best man to fix our economy and protect our borders.
**************************************************
Bottom line.
Don’t be distracted by shiny objects or squirrels going into bathrooms.
Unless you want Hillary.
Heck of a job Brownie. That’s who this is, new Orleans fema brown. An idiot who has always been in full GOP autosuck mode.
Dim bulb first class.
Thanks for posting I have known that for a while now
Hey, no kidding. No one running for public office is my protector. My protector is the Lord Jesus Christ. None other is to be trusted. Every single one of the candidates running will fail us, either through their own personal beliefs or their own personal habits. That is what happens in a fallen world.
No, I don’t have any faith or trust in Trump. Nor do I have any faith or trust in any candidate the GOP might dredge up. Nor do I have any faith or trust in the American people. Or anything to do with the country.
The whole damned nation has become a sick, demented, faggoty hellhole, and I don’t have any remote belief left that it’s going to turn around. All I’m going to do is perhaps buy some marshmallows to cook over the flames as they continue to engulf this sick, sorry shadow of a formerly great nation.
What a circus. Choose your ring.
The problem with constitutionally low-information Trump, and likewise low-information Christians, is this imo. Evidently neither Trump or Christians understand that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for either abortions or transgender restrooms.
In other words, any official, vote-winning action that the feds take on these issues is based on 10th Amendment-protected state powers and state revenues that the feds have stolen from the states in the form of unconstitutional federal taxes.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. ... United States v. Butler, 1936.
The states need to amend the Constitution to get political parties and their Constitution-ignoring platforms out of the federal government.
In fact, given that one of the very few powers that the states have actually delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, to regulate an aspect of domestic policy is to run the US Mail Service (1.8.7), the key question to ask concerning political party support of federal government leaders is this.
How many political parties does it take to run the US Mail Service?
I say none.