It’s not an abstract issue where I live. Big flap in California because Gov. Moonbeam 2.0 signed a law permitting sex perverts to use whatever bathroom or locker room they choose. Now the school district in my town has a problem on its hands: A high school girl claims she’s a “male” and want to use the boys locker room to change/shower for gym class. She was offered an alternate area, but declined. A big setup by her unfit parents. Other parents and boys objecting to it. “Solution?” At taxpayer expense, construct individual stalls in the locker rooms throughout the school district. Wait until a healthy teenage boy says he’s a “female” and wants to use their locker room and restrooms. Then the war erupts.
Thanks you’re the first to provide an example.
Most Americans realize any solution to this will be at taxpayer expense.
That pretty much does away with DTs argument against the North Carolina law where he argued it ended up costing the state money.
How much is it going to cost businesses and state governments to build XX/XY restrooms?
North Carolina was right. Best to head it off now.
The Department of Justice leaned on a public school district with threat of withdrawing funds because a transgender (mentally ill boy) wanted to use the girls’ locker rooms. They let him use a stall with curtain in the locker room, but he didn’t want to be treated differently. He sued and the federal government sided with him that he had a right to stand naked with a penis in front of girls and see them naked in order to feel like a girl.