I didn’t say Bush was different, frankly. I was pointing out its start with Clinton. From there, NATO became a de facto arm of the European Union to serve as a tool for its own expansion (which is certainly not “us running Europe”, which was never the definition of the so-called NWO anyhow); our leaders let that happen, and walking away from it rather than putting a stop to it will just make it worse.
Calling “leading from behind” by a new name will not change the outcome.
You said we shouldn’t have “allowed” Europe to run its foreign policy in this way. We don’t run Europe, except as NWO types.
And as for Mexico, you think we should have invaded in 1938? Anyone in the 1930s suggesting America go to war because Japan and China, or because Ethiopia was fighting Italy would have been laughed off stage. And you see FDR as an isolationist? Are you high??
FDR worked morning noon and night to bring the American people into war. Lend lease, training, anti-sub work, starting a prewar draft. The willow run plant that churned out bombers was dedicated 6 months before Pearl Harbor and a week before the Russians were invaded. Convoys ran non stop.
Its a freakin’ idiotic Euro slander to say America wasn’t in the war before December 7th. We were in it in a very big way, and they couldn’t have survived without us picking a side and doing what we did.
But no junior, FDR was not an isolationist. The criticism of him is that he was too international and too fast to drag us into the war.
Nobody, except you thinks Italy fighting in Ethiopia was causas belli.